Summary:

  • The All England Lawn Tennis Club received approval for a £200 million expansion of Wimbledon following a High Court ruling dismissing a legal challenge by local campaigners.
  • The expansion involves transforming the former Wimbledon Park Golf Club into an extension of the Grand Slam venue, including 38 new grass courts and an 8,000-seat show stadium.
  • The campaign group Save Wimbledon Park argued against the expansion due to restrictive covenants and the site’s heritage status associated with the historic landscape designed by Capability Brown.
  • Justice Saini ruled in favor of the development, stating that the planning permission was legally and rationally granted by the Greater London Authority.
  • The All England Club expressed its commitment to responsibly manage the expansion, ensuring respect for the park’s history while enhancing tournament infrastructure and community access.
  • Despite the ruling, opposition from local residents and campaigners continues, with Save Wimbledon Park considering an appeal, and construction aiming to be completed by 2030.

The All England Lawn Tennis Club has received the green light to proceed with a major £200 million expansion of Wimbledon, following a High Court ruling that dismissed a legal challenge brought by local campaigners. The decision, handed down by Mr Justice Saini on Monday, marks the end of a lengthy legal dispute over the future of the historic parkland adjacent to the tournament’s grounds.

The contested development will see the former Wimbledon Park Golf Club transformed into an extension of the existing Grand Slam venue. The plans include the construction of 38 new grass courts and an 8,000-seat show stadium, enabling Wimbledon to host all of its qualifying matches on-site for the first time in its history. In total, the new complex would nearly triple the size of the current facilities.

At the heart of the case was a challenge led by campaign group Save Wimbledon Park, which argued that the land is covered by restrictive covenants dating back to the early 1990s, when the golf course was purchased from the local authority. Members of the group also emphasized that the area is a Grade II*-listed heritage site, part of a landscape originally designed by renowned 18th-century architect Capability Brown.

“You could not have a more protected piece of land in London,” said Sasha White KC, representing the group during proceedings. He claimed the expansion would irreparably harm the historic character of the site, and that the planning process had overlooked key legal safeguards connected to the land’s status.

However, the judge found no grounds to block the development, concluding that the Greater London Authority acted within its legal remit when granting planning permission. In his ruling, Justice Saini wrote that the GLA’s decision reflected “a planning judgment rationally exercised and having regard to appropriate and relevant factors,” rejecting the central claims made by the campaigners.

The All England Club welcomed the verdict and reiterated its commitment to responsibly developing the site. The club has said the new courts will not only improve the tournament’s infrastructure but also offer year-round access to the wider community. “We remain committed to delivering a transformation project that respects the environment and history of Wimbledon Park while securing the future of The Championships,” an AELTC spokesperson stated following the ruling.

Nonetheless, opposition remains vocal. Comedian and local resident Andy Hamilton, who joined the campaign, criticized the project’s scale and environmental impact. Speaking to reporters, he said, “I’m vehemently opposed to this expansion. It’s a plan that will decimate the park at huge cost to the local environment and to the local community.”

Despite the High Court’s decision, Save Wimbledon Park has not ruled out further legal action. The group indicated it is considering whether to appeal the ruling, meaning the legal battle may not yet be over.

If the project goes ahead as scheduled, construction is expected to begin in the near future, with the ambition that the new facilities could be ready in time for the 2030 Championships. For Wimbledon, the expansion is seen as a pivotal step in maintaining its position among the world’s leading tennis events — a move that now appears firmly within reach.

Background:

Here is how this event developed over time:

  • October 2018: The All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) purchases the leasehold of Wimbledon Park Golf Club for £65 million, laying the groundwork for future development.
  • April 2021: AELTC submits a £200 million expansion proposal including 38 new courts and an 8,000-seat stadium on the former golf course land.
  • September 2021: Merton Council and Wandsworth Council approve the expansion plans, triggering public controversy.
  • 2022–2023: Local campaign group Save Wimbledon Park (SWP) organizes petitions and protests, raising environmental and heritage concerns.
  • October 2023: The Greater London Authority (GLA) grants final planning approval for the AELTC expansion project.
  • December 2023: SWP files a judicial review request, challenging the legality of the GLA’s planning decision based on land-use covenants and planning policy.
  • July 2025: The High Court dismisses the legal challenge, ruling the decision to be within rational planning judgment and allowing the expansion project to proceed.