Summary:

  • The Independent Water Commission report recommends dismantling the current regulatory structure in England and Wales.
  • Proposal includes abolishing Ofwat and replacing existing organizations with single integrated regulators per nation.
  • Regional water planning bodies would be created to decentralize infrastructure planning.
  • The UK government supports establishing a statutory water ombudsman with legal powers to resolve consumer disputes.
  • Mandatory water metering and a social tariff for low-income households are part of the fairness reforms.
  • Implementation of 88 recommended reforms will take years, but initial government responses indicate strong support.

A sweeping report from the Independent Water Commission has recommended dismantling the regulatory framework that governs the water industry in England and Wales, calling for the abolition of Ofwat and a raft of other oversight bodies. The final report, published on 21 July 2025, comes amid mounting criticism of the sector over pollution, infrastructure failures and a perceived lack of accountability. The review—described as the most comprehensive since the privatisation of water services in the 1980s—sets out 88 recommendations aimed at overhauling management of the sector and restoring public trust.

At the heart of the proposals is a plan to replace multiple regulators with a single integrated watchdog in each nation. In England, a new unified regulator would assume responsibility for economic, environmental, and drinking water oversight—roles currently shared between Ofwat, the Environment Agency, the Drinking Water Inspectorate, and Natural England. In Wales, the duties would be consolidated under an enhanced Natural Resources Wales.

Sir Jon Cunliffe, who chaired the commission, argued that fragmentation across the current regulatory system had led to duplication of effort, gaps in enforcement, and inconsistencies in holding companies to account. “The current model is no longer fit for purpose,” he said, adding that a streamlined approach would allow for “clearer responsibility, stronger oversight, and better outcomes for people and the environment.”

The report also lays out plans to decentralise long-term infrastructure planning through the creation of regional water system planning bodies—eight in England and one in Wales. Each would develop locally informed strategies, taking into account climate pressures, population growth and ecological needs. These new bodies would be composed of representatives from local government, public health, and consumer groups, with powers to guide investment priorities and oversee delivery.

In response to the findings, the UK government announced plans to create a statutory, independent water ombudsman tasked with handling consumer disputes. Unlike the current voluntary system, the new ombudsman would have legal authority to resolve complaints across the sector.

Speaking after the report’s release, Environment Secretary Steve Reed said the government welcomed the “root and branch reform” called for by the commission. “We are determined to make the water industry properly accountable to the public,” he noted, confirming that the ombudsman measure would be one of the first steps in responding to the report’s recommendations.

The suggestions are also aimed at addressing longstanding concerns around fairness and affordability. The report calls for mandatory water metering across England and Wales and recommends introducing a social tariff to support low-income households. According to data cited in the review, only just over half of consumers currently consider their water bills to be fair—a figure recorded before a 26% average price increase earlier this year.

The commission’s work was jointly commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments in the aftermath of a series of high-profile environmental incidents, including widespread criticism over the release of untreated sewage into rivers and seas, and growing concerns about water companies’ financial strategies. The report portrays an industry struggling to adapt to modern demands and climate risks, hindered by regulatory misalignment and legacy structures.

With the regulatory changes likely to require primary legislation, implementation may take several years. The government has not yet formally endorsed all 88 recommendations, but the tone of official response has so far signalled broad support.

Sir Jon concluded that public trust must be rebuilt “one step at a time, with visible changes that show the industry is being run in the public interest.” Whether these proposed reforms achieve that remains to be seen, but the call for fundamental change has now been firmly placed on the political agenda.

Background:

Here is how this event developed over time:

  • 1980s: The water industry in England and Wales is privatised, leading to a fragmented regulatory framework.
  • April 2025: Water bills rise by 26%, intensifying public dissatisfaction amid increasing sewage spills and infrastructure failures.
  • July 21, 2025: The Independent Water Commission, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, publishes its final report, the most comprehensive review since privatisation, with 88 recommendations.
  • July 21, 2025: The report recommends abolishing Ofwat, the Drinking Water Inspectorate, and water-related functions of the Environment Agency and Natural England to reduce duplication and improve oversight.
  • July 21, 2025: It proposes creating a single integrated water regulator for England and a regulator for Wales under Natural Resources Wales.
  • July 21, 2025: The report calls for establishing eight regional water system planning authorities in England and one national authority for Wales.
  • July 21, 2025: Additional recommendations include mandatory water metering, a social tariff for vulnerable customers, and a whole-firm regulatory approach for water companies.
  • July 21, 2025: The UK government announces plans to create a new, legally binding water ombudsman to handle customer disputes, replacing the current voluntary scheme.